Many of you have written in to ask, and the answer is yes -- I did read that Britney had the baby.
From the Associated Press:
"Spears, who married Federline in September last year, had been previously reported as saying she planned to have the baby by Caesarean section to avoid the pain of a natural birth."
I think that comments on this issue from my smart and funny friends sum it all up for me.
The first email I received on the subject read, "What the *$&#%??! She had previously said that having a child is the next closest thing to knowing God, but she's wimping out of labor? Give me a break! You take drugs to get a c-section (sometimes you're even knocked out), and you would get drugs for labor. Would she rather have the scar than a stretched out cooter that will naturally tighten back up?!"
It was closely followed by a comment from another friend:
"A scheduled c-section to avoid the unpleasantries of childbirth?! That's a great way to start out parenthood: "Dear Baby, I know you have your 'schedule' and 'needs' or whatever, but I'd rather not be conscious. It hurts! Plus if I schedule it a little early I don't gain those last few pounds. Love, Mom."
Yep, that pretty much says it all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
it tightens back up naturally? I'm skeptical, but ... Awesome!!!
Did you also know that healing from a c-section takes 3 times longer than healing from "natural" birth . . . Jokes on her!
Who want's their sexpot pop star with a giant scar, left from where a human was pulled, zipping across her formerly lovely bare abs?
At least she gave him a better name than I was expecting.
I wrote that when I heard his name was Sean Preston Spears-Federline yesterday. But now I hear its a myriad of other shitty ones. I'd like to retract my original statement until People lays down their final (3 million dollar) word. I should have known better than to trust anyother media source. sigh.
After it is all said and done you could probably stick your hand in there and still flip a quarter.
Post a Comment